Item Coversheet

REPORT TO SHASTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS


BOARD MEETING DATE:  November  7, 2017
CATEGORY:  Consent - General Government-7.

SUBJECT:

Speed Limits 2017

DEPARTMENT: Clerk of the Board

Supervisorial District No. :  All

DEPARTMENT CONTACT:  Pat Minturn, Public Works Director, (530) 225-5661

STAFF REPORT APPROVED BY:  Pat Minturn, Public Works Director

Vote Required?

Simple Majority Vote
General Fund Impact?

No General Fund Impact 

RECOMMENDATION

As introduced on October 24, 2017, enact an Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Shasta Amending Ordinance No. 408 of Shasta County Entitled “An Ordinance Placing Speed Restriction on Motor Vehicle Travel over Certain Streets and Portions Thereof,” by amending Section II establishing the following speed restrictions:  (1) A 55 miles per hour (mph) on Airport Road (2H04) from north end of the Sacramento River Bridge to 170’ north of Dersch Road (2H02); (2) a 45 mph on Airport Road (2H04) from 170’ north of Dersch Road (2H02) to Redding city limits; (3) a 50 mph on Bear Mountain Road (5H04) from Old Oregon Trail to Dry Creek Road (4J02); (4) a 40 mph on Bear Mountain Road (5H04) from Dry Creek Road (4J02) to Silverthorn Road (5J050); (5) a 55 mph on Canyon Road (2G09) from Happy Valley Road (2G02) to Redding city limits; (6) a 55 mph on Cloverdale Road (2G05) from Oak Street (2G08) to Clover Lane (2F020); (7) a 45 mph on Cloverdale Road (2G05) from Clover Lane (2F020) to Clear Creek Road (1C01B); (8) a 45 mph on Cloverdale Road (2G05) from Clear Creek Road (1C01B) to Placer Road (3F01); (9) a 45 mph on Dry Creek Road (4J02) from SH299 to 1 mile north; a 45 mph on First Street (1H05) from Charles Street (1H06) to Main Street (1H03); (10) a 40 mph on Fourth Street (1H01A) from Main Street (1H03) to Balls Ferry Road (1H02E); (11) a 50 mph on Happy Valley Road (2G02) from Canyon Road (2G09) to Newcastle Drive; (12) a 40 mph on Happy Valley Road (2G02) from Newcastle Drive to Olinda Road (2G01); (13) a 55 mph on Happy Valley Road (2G02) from Olinda Road (2G01) to Coyote Lane (2G012); (14) a 50 mph on Main Street (1H03) from Interstate 5 to 800 feet north of Fourth Street (1H01A); (15) a 30 mph on Main Street (1H03) from 800 feet north of Fourth Street (1H01) to Fourth Street (1H01); (16) a 30 mph on Main Street (1H03) from Fourth Street (1H01) to 800 feet south of Front Street 1H02A); (17) a 40 mph on Main Street (1H03) from Shasta/Tehama county line to 800 feet south of Front Street (1H02A); (18) a 50 mph on Old Oregon Trail (3H02) from Redding city limit to Old Alturas Road (4H04); (19) a 55 mph on Old Oregon Trail (3H02) from Shasta College Drive to Oasis Road (4F03A); (20) a 55 mph on Placer Road (3F01) from Redding city limit to Simmons Road (3G008); (21) a 55 mph on Rhonda Road (1H08) from Anderson city limit to 0.6 miles south of Anderson city limit; and (22) a 45 mph on Rhonda Road (1H08) from 0.6 miles south of Anderson city limits to Castlewood Drive.

SUMMARY

Updated speed limits are proposed along selected County roads.

DISCUSSION

Shasta County maintains 1193 miles of County roads. Speed limits are set based upon Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) conducted in conformance with applicable codes. The California Highway Patrol (CHP) enforces those speed limits. The CHP has specifically requested E&TS along twelve roads to permit enforcement with radar. Complete details are included in the attached summary table and individual E&TS.

 

Speed limits are designed to match the 85th percentile speed based upon an E&TS.  The underlying assumption is that six out of every seven motorists are traveling at a speed which is safe and prudent.  Most of our existing speed limits were set in the latter half of the twentieth century.  Some may have been noncompliant when they were established.  Speed limits must be reviewed every seven years if they are to remain enforceable with radar.  Vehicle designs have improved.  Codes have been modified to limit downward adjustments.  The net result has been an upward trend in enforceable speed limits. Lower speed limits may be permitted under certain circumstances (accident rates, school zones, residential and commercial districts).  These exemptions have been applied as available and applicable.  The CalTrans Traffic Manual provides guidance as follows:

 

 

 

“The setting of speed limits requires a rational and defensible procedure to maintain the confidence of the public and legal systems. By following a uniform procedure, agencies can establish speed limits that are uniform throughout the state and avoid influence from political pressure or emotional perceptions.”

 

“…Studies of the effects of establishing, raising and lowering speed limits include federal studies FHWA-RD-92-084 and FHWA-RD-98-154… The empirical data in these studies demonstrates that setting the speed limit too high or too low can increase collisions. Speed limits that are set near the 85th percentile speed of free flowing traffic are safer and produce less variance in vehicle speeds. Because of this, the 85th percentile is used to establish the upper limit of operating speeds that are considered reasonable and prudent.”

 

“Regardless of the posted speed limit, the majority of drivers will continue to drive at speeds at which they feel comfortable. The question then arises, “Why do we even need to post speed limit signs?” In part, posting speed limit signs:

 

  • Provides feedback to the driver, letting them know if they are in the majority of

drivers who consider their speed safe and reasonable.

 

  •  Allows for fair enforcement for those drivers who are going exceedingly faster or

    slower than the speed the majority of drivers consider safe and reasonable.

     

  • Determines many other design criteria such as clear recovery zone distance, yellow

    light timing, taper lengths for any type of lane closure or construction, set-back detectors,

    size of signs, and other roadway features.”

 

Highway safety performance is a function of enforcement, engineering, education and emergency responders.  The CHP and the County are working to identify corridors where safety may be enhanced through integrated efforts (speed limits, collision analyses, road improvements, enhanced enforcement, etc.).  The CHP and the County are conducting studies and have applied for various grants.  Related items are anticipated to come before the Board within the next year.

ALTERNATIVES

The Board may decline to update speed limits.  The CHP may still enforce a 55 mph maximum speed limit.

OTHER AGENCY INVOLVEMENT

The CHP has been involved throughout the process and concurs with the recommended action.  County Counsel has reviewed and approved the Ordinance as to form.  The County Administrative Office has reviewed this recommendation.

FINANCING

Adequate funds are included in the Adopted FY 2017/18 Road Fund budget.  There is no General Fund impact.

ATTACHMENTS:
DescriptionUpload DateDescription
Shasta County Engineering and Traffic Survey Results (2017)10/9/2017Shasta County Engineering and Traffic Survey Results (2017)
Engineering and Traffic Surveys for Various Roadways (September 2017)10/9/2017Engineering and Traffic Surveys for Various Roadways (September 2017)
Speed Limit Ordinance 408-21210/18/2017Speed Limit Ordinance 408-212
Ord 408-212 final10/25/2017Ord 408-212 final